Cricket News

'We want to dominate world cricket' - Smriti Mandhana on India's huge aspirations

By Arun NairFebruary 22, 2026
'We want to dominate world cricket' - Smriti Mandhana on India's huge aspirations

Kohli's Century in Vain as India Falters in Third ODI Against South Africa

A century. And yet, defeat. Virat Kohli's stellar innings wasn't enough to secure a victory for India in the third ODI against South Africa.

The match, held at Newlands Cricket Ground in Cape Town on January 21, 2024, saw South Africa defeat India by 4 runs, securing the series 2-1. South Africa posted a total of 296/8 in their 50 overs. Despite Kohli's magnificent 103, India could only muster 292/6. This leaves serious questions for India's middle order.

The numbers don't lie. Kohli's century was a masterclass in ODI batting. His average against South Africa remains impressive, but one has to ask what happened at the other end? Statistically speaking, the rest of the Indian batting lineup struggled to maintain a consistent scoring rate. When you look at the data, it's clear that partnerships were lacking.

Virat Kohli: 103 runs off 120 balls (Strike Rate: 85.83)
KL Rahul: 38 runs off 50 balls (Strike Rate: 76.00)
Shreyas Iyer: 52 runs off 54 balls (Strike Rate: 96.30)
Suryakumar Yadav: 39 runs off 37 balls (Strike Rate: 105.41)

Notice anything? Only Suryakumar Yadav managed a strike rate above 100. The others simply couldn't accelerate when required. The slow scoring rate in the middle overs ultimately cost India the match. The corridor of uncertainty seemed to haunt more than one batsman. It looked like a sticky wicket out there at times.

South Africa's innings was built around contributions from several batsmen. Reeza Hendricks top-scored with 88. Rassie van der Dussen contributed a solid 59.

Reeza Hendricks: 88 runs off 91 balls (Strike Rate: 96.70)
Rassie van der Dussen: 59 runs off 73 balls (Strike Rate: 80.82)
David Miller: 39 runs off 38 balls (Strike Rate: 102.63)

Their collective effort, combined with a disciplined bowling performance, proved too much for India. South Africa's bowlers maintained tight lines and lengths, preventing the Indian batsmen from freely scoring boundaries.

The bowling figures highlight this:

Keshav Maharaj: 10-0-45-1 (Economy Rate: 4.50)
Lungi Ngidi: 9-0-64-2 (Economy Rate: 7.11)
Andile Phehlukwayo: 8-0-44-2 (Economy Rate: 5.50)

Compare this to India's bowling performance. It's a stark contrast. Their bowlers conceded too many runs, particularly in the final overs, allowing South Africa to set a challenging target. The bowlers were beaten all ends up at times.

India's loss exposes several areas of concern. The middle-order batting needs serious attention. The inability to rotate the strike and accelerate when necessary is a recurring issue. The bowling attack also lacks consistency, particularly in closing out innings.

What does this series loss mean for India's preparation for future global cricket tournaments? It raises questions about team selection, batting strategy, and the overall balance of the squad. Can India address these concerns in time? Only time will tell if they are up to the task. This is crucial for their chances in upcoming competitions.